Creative Teaching as a Method to Enhance Negotiation Skills in Primary and Secondary

Introduction

Young people today must learn to communicate effectively in an era where much interaction is mediated by screens such as captions, emojis, and texts, which often strip away nuance and empathy. As digital communication dominates childhood and adolescence, it is vital to balance it with creative classroom practices that encourage genuine human interaction and negotiation. Instead of just typing “why?” or “OK”, students need practical experience in resolving conflicts face-to-face: listening actively, clarifying, exploring interests, and preparing alternatives like BATNA and WATNA for situations where an agreement cannot be reached. Particularly when they face circumstances that seem devastating and do not know what to do, may panic, and, in extreme cases, attempt suicide - an issue I have observed while working with schools across different countries in Europe and Asia.

Why Negotiation Goes Beyond Communication

Children naturally negotiate over toys, turns, and roles, but seldom with structure or tools. Explicit instruction in negotiation encourages emotional intelligence, decreases conflict, and fosters cooperation (Psychology Today, 2014). When pupils learn to consider others’ interests, brainstorm solutions, and plan for alternatives, they progress towards collaborative problem-solving that extends beyond school.

However, without guidance, these early negotiations often turn into power struggles or emotional outbursts. Teaching negotiation introduces vocabulary such as compromise, fairness, and empathy, which empower children to express their needs rather than reacting impulsively. It transforms everyday conflicts into learning opportunities. Instead of merely enforcing rules, educators and carers can model communication strategies that teach children and young people to pause, listen actively, and seek win-win solutions.

Furthermore, negotiation fosters critical thinking and patience. Students must assess options, anticipate reactions, and sometimes postpone gratification for the greater good. This cognitive shift promotes resilience: children begin to view setbacks not as failures, but as part of a process towards mutual understanding. When applied consistently, these skills can reduce bullying, improve peer relationships, and foster inclusive classrooms where every voice is valued.

In a swiftly changing world, collaboration remains a fundamental element of success. By integrating negotiation skills into early education, we not only cultivate harmonious environments but also prepare future leaders to resolve disputes with empathy and clarity. From playgrounds to boardrooms, the ability to negotiate effectively is not just a useful communication skill, but a crucial life asset.

Crucial Concepts: Active Listening, Interests, BATNA/WATNA, Perspective Taking

Role-playing activities where students paraphrase each other's statements, ask clarifying questions, and reflect feelings help build empathy and reduce misunderstandings. Teaching students to look beyond "I want that toy" to "I want fun" or "I want attention" enables interest-based negotiation and mutual gain. Even young learners can grasp fallback options: if no agreement is reached, what’s the best alternative? What’s the worst outcome? This encourages preparation and realistic expectations. Developing collaborative attitudes requires the ability to see a situation from another’s point of view, a skill linked to better creative solutions and improved relationships.

Clarifying BATNA and WATNA in the School Context

In negotiation theory, BATNA refers to the best outcome someone can achieve if the current negotiation fails. WATNA, by contrast, is the worst possible alternative. Teaching students to identify these options fosters rational thinking and emotional regulation, particularly in high-stakes situations.

Consider this scenario:

A student, Jordan, has just found out he failed his end-of-year math test and is at risk of repeating the grade. He's upset and wants to negotiate with his teacher for another chance. This is an emotionally charged moment, but a perfect opportunity to apply BATNA and WATNA thinking.

Jordan's BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement): If the teacher is unwilling to allow a full retake, Jordan could propose a summer remedial project, tutoring, or a makeup assignment to demonstrate mastery. He might also explore whether he can advance conditionally, with extra support in the next grade. These are productive alternatives if a full test retake isn’t an option.

Jordan's WATNA (Worst Alternative): If he refuses to engage constructively or negotiates poorly, the worst-case scenario is that he repeats the same year without support or is labelled unmotivated, which could impact his confidence and relationships with teachers and peers.

From the teacher's perspective, having a student like Jordan articulate these options demonstrates maturity and commitment to learning. It also facilitates mutual problem-solving: what solution guarantees fairness, encourages academic development, and aligns with school policy?

Why It Matters

When students learn to consider their BATNA and WATNA, they gain clarity about their goals, develop contingency planning skills, and become less reactive in stressful moments. Instead of viewing negotiation as a win/lose contest, they begin to see it as an opportunity for mutual progress. In classrooms, this mindset fosters accountability, resilience, and a stronger sense of agency.

Creative Teaching Approaches to Build Negotiation Skills.
Learning how to negotiate doesn’t have to be dull; it can be enjoyable, interactive, and energetic. Creative activities like role-playing, games, simulations, and co-creating projects allow students to practise real-life communication skills in a safe and supportive environment.

Role-Play Examples

In a classroom role-play, students could act out a mock student council meeting where they decide how to allocate school fundraising funds. One student might support new sports equipment, another for art supplies, and a third for a field trip. They need to listen to each other, explain their reasons, and find a solution that works for everyone, possibly agreeing to split the money or organise another fundraiser.

In another role-play, two students act as classmates debating over a shared locker. One wants space for sports gear, the other for books. The teacher guides them to express their needs, propose compromises, and help them reach an agreement.

These situations help students practise seeing both sides, managing tension, and finding common ground, meaning the skills they can apply at school, at home, and later in life.

Games and Simulations

Students can also design and play negotiation-based games. For example, they might create a board game where players trade resources (like water, money, or land) to solve a fictional world crisis. While playing, they practise making offers, asking questions, and thinking creatively to meet goals. These activities build teamwork, quick thinking, and patience.

Simulations can focus on real-world topics such as climate change negotiations, urban planning, or school regulations. Students take on roles like a city mayor, pupil, teacher, or parent, working collaboratively to solve a problem. This helps them understand how different perspectives affect decision-making.

Improvisation and Thinking on Your Feet

Improv games like acting out a disagreement with made-up characters or solving a problem with silly rules help students stay flexible and think on their feet. For example, if two students pretend to be aliens trying to share a spaceship, they have to get creative and adapt when new challenges are introduced. This kind of playful pressure teaches how to deal with unforeseen situations, just as real-life negotiations often demand.

Classroom-Based Negotiation Programs and Mediation

Standalone classroom negotiation programmes empower students to “act as their own mediator.” Instead of relying on an adult to resolve disputes, students are guided through a structured process where each party describes their side of the issue, actively listens to the other’s perspective, identifies underlying needs, brainstorms potential solutions, and collaborates to implement a mutually agreed resolution. This student-led approach not only reduces dependence on authority figures but also promotes independence, emotional regulation, and communication skills.

Example: Disagreement Over Group Project Roles

In a fifth-grade class, two students, Sasha and Luis, argue over who should be the presenter for their group science project. The teacher has introduced a simple negotiation protocol using role cards and visual aids:

Each student explains their perspective

Sasha: “I want to present because I enjoy speaking and I practised the script.”

Luis: “I want to present too. I’ve worked hard on the project and want to share my ideas.”

They listen and restate each other’s points

Sasha: “You feel like you’ve done a lot of work and want a chance to be heard.”

Luis: “You’ve practised and feel ready to present.”

They identify underlying needs

Sasha wishes to be recognised for her preparation and enjoys public speaking.

Luis seeks acknowledgement for his effort and contribution.

They brainstorm options

Co-present: split the presentation.

Alternate roles in future projects.

Add a visual role (Luis) and a speaking role (Sasha), with shared Q&A.

They select a solution and put it into practice

They agree to split the presentation and rehearse together at recess.

Through this process, students not only resolve the conflict but also practise fairness, compromise, and perspective-taking.

Integrating Cooperative Problem Solving & Argumentation

Collaborative problem solving in small groups, especially around ill‑structured, real-world-like tasks, fosters negotiation, critical thinking, and argumentation skills. Research in socio‑scientific issues shows that group-based negotiation improves reasoning, perspective-taking, and awareness of moral norms.

Examples by Educational Level

Primary students: Two young children argue over a puzzle. The teacher guides them: “You want quiet; you want challenge.” They listen carefully, identify their interests, brainstorm options (co‑build, take turns, pick another), and select a solution. They consider what might happen if no agreement is reached (WATNA) and what alternative options they could fall back on (BATNA).

Secondary students: In a simulation of environmental policy, student groups represent different stakeholders like: developers, conservationists, community voices. They identify positions versus interests, calculate BATNA/WATNA (e.g., budget cuts, community unrest), and work towards a win-win plan such as sustainable eco-tourism that balances interests.

Importance of Teacher Modelling and Reflective Debrief

Research shows that students improve in understanding others' thoughts and feelings when teachers actively guide them to consider different perspectives. This approach works especially well during activities like role-plays, simulations, class projects, or structured discussions. When teachers ask questions such as, “How do you think they felt?” or “Why might they have made that choice?”, students begin to see situations from more than just their own point of view. But the learning doesn’t end there. After the activity, it's important to set aside time for a thoughtful debrief. This reflection helps students make sense of what happened and why. A meaningful debrief might explore questions like: What went well during this activity? What didn’t go as planned? Were there hidden interests, emotions, or goals influencing people’s actions? When students reflect in this way, they deepen their learning and are more likely to apply these skills in real life. What starts as a simple classroom task becomes a valuable lesson in empathy, problem-solving, and collaboration.

Benefits and Long-Term Outcomes

When executed effectively, teaching negotiation skills has a significant influence on students and the overall classroom environment. It aids students in developing emotional intelligence. Additionally, they learn to name their feelings, understand others’ emotions, and handle conflict constructively. These skills are vital not only for academic success but also for life beyond school. When students know how to express themselves calmly, listen to others, and seek mutually beneficial solutions, the entire classroom dynamic improves. There are fewer disagreements, more cooperation, and stronger relationships among students.

Negotiation-based learning also boosts student engagement. They feel listened to, respected, and involved in classroom activities. When students take part in discussions about group work, responsibilities, or class rules, they are more likely to follow through and contribute actively. They learn that their voice counts, which in turn enhances their confidence, motivation, and sense of belonging.

Research indicates that when teachers employ cooperative, negotiation-oriented activities such as group problem-solving or role-playing challenging scenarios, students perform better on open-ended and complex tasks. These tasks do not have just one correct answer; they require adaptable thinking, teamwork, and communication. However, the key to success is teacher support. When teachers guide students through the process, helping them reflect, remain respectful, and focus on interests rather than positions, students not only complete the tasks more effectively but also develop socially and emotionally.

In summary, negotiation education isn't solely about conflict resolution. It's a method to develop more intelligent, compassionate, and cooperative learners who are better equipped for both academic hurdles and real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

Creative teaching that explicitly develops negotiation skills, including active listening, perspective-taking, interest‑based brainstorming, and BATNA/WATNA concepts, equips primary and secondary students with tools to resolve conflicts thoughtfully. From playful role-plays in early years to structured policy simulations in secondary education, these experiences foster empathy, critical thinking, and resilience. In an age where digital messaging can strip nuance, teaching negotiation face-to-face becomes crucial. When teachers model collaboration and reflection, classrooms become laboratories for peace rather than mere centers for content.

References

Carbonaro, C. M., Zurru, A., Fanti, V., Tuveri, M., & Usai, G. (2020). Cooperative problem solving in high‑school teaching. arXiv preprint.

Conflict Resolution Education Connection. (n.d.). Negotiation skills training: Empowering students as mediators.

Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin.

Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective‑taking and negotiation effectiveness. Negotiation Journal.

Gkogkidis, V., & Dacre, N. (2021). Co‑creating educational board games to enhance engagement. arXiv preprint.

MIT Press. (Year). Improvisation and teaching negotiation: Developing essential skills. Negotiation Journal.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Reasoning as argumentative practice. Research in Science Education.

Pulgar, J., Candia, C., & Leonardi, P. (2019). Classroom cooperation and problem solving. arXiv preprint.

Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School. (Year). How to teach children to self‑advocate through negotiation.

Paths of Learning. (n.d.). 7 group games for teaching negotiation skills.

Psychology Today. (2014, Feb). Can children learn to negotiate? Listen to the Kids blog.

Williams, G. M. (2011). Examining classroom negotiation strategies of international teaching assistants. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), Article 21.

Armenian Folia Anglistika. (2024). Enhancing negotiation skills within educational settings. Vol. 20(1).